The following great peripherals war has been waged over your ears. After every company on this planet put out a gaming mouse after which a mechanical keyboard, now it’s time for headsets. So gaming headphone.
We all know you don’t wish to scroll through each and every headset review when all you want is a simple answer: “What’s the most effective gaming headset I can buy with my hard-earned dollars?” This article supports the answer you seek, whatever your financial allowance is.
We’ll keep updating our recommendations when we look at new releases and find stronger contenders. Just for this latest update, we’ve reviewed a couple of fancypants models, namely the Sennheiser Game Zero and and Sennheiser GSP 350, and also the Audio-Technica ATH-AG1X. To get more earthly budgets, we’ve also tested the SteelSeries Arctis 7, the HyperX Cloud Revolver S, as well as the Logitech G533, which debuts as our new best mid-range wireless headset.
Kingston doesn’t have the same pedigree in the headset space as its competitors, however the HyperX Cloud is a winning device at the cheap price.
Our 2016 headset recommendation remains virtually just like our 2015 headset recommendation (and our 2014, for that matter): The Kingston HyperX Cloud. Or, if you’re feeling a bit fancier, the Cloud II. It’s comfortable, it sounds great, and (best of all) it’s relatively inexpensive. What else could you possibly want in a headset?
True to its name, the HyperX Cloud is among the most comfortable headsets on the market. It’s hefty, with a solid-metal construction that belies its cheap price, but sits feather-light on the head. The faux-leather earpieces are generously padded, oversized, and form an effective seal without squeezing too hard.
And yes it sounds excellent. As I said in your review, this isn’t a studio-quality pair of headphones. It’s got the common gaming-centric bass boost and a slick top quality, but both of these are subtle enough that this HyperX Cloud competes favorably with bluetooth headphone twice its cost. There’s no Kingston-provided means to adjust the sound, considering the fact that the HyperX Cloud connects through standard 3.5mm jacks, but you honestly shouldn’t need to tweak it in any way out from the box. It appears pretty damn great.
The sole negative thing is the microphone. It’s very flexible, which I appreciate, but has a propensity to pick up background noise and plosives while leaving your voice nasally and hollow.
The slightly-more-expensive HyperX Cloud II is, I feel, more a lateral move than a noticeable difference over its predecessor. It swaps the 3.5mm connection to get a 7.1-ready USB soundcard with better in-line controls and a little bit of noise cancellation on the microphone, however you wouldn’t notice an enormous difference between both the iterations and I’m uncertain the increase in cost makes it worth while.
Regardless, either model is an excellent choice for a gaming headset. In a increasingly crowded market, the HyperX Cloud nails just about every major category with few significant compromises. I hope the following model improves in the microphone, but for $80 it’s a steal.
The Cloud Stinger provides solid sound, serious comfort, and an attractive design for everyone who just requires a “good enough” headset without the wallet-shock.
HyperX’s Cloud headset continues to be our favorite, however the company undercut themselves a little bit by releasing the HyperX Cloud Stinger. Listed at $50, it’s one of the cheapest gaming headsets I’ve ever seen from a reputable brand. And it’s good.
Sure, it’s not quite as good as the original Cloud, but for many individuals the Stinger must do perfectly. The plastic chassis lacks a few of the original Cloud’s panache and sturdiness, but looks high-end coming from a distance and sits pretty slim on the head. HyperX also solved the Cloud’s biggest issue and ultimately put a volume slider straight at the base of your right earcup and gave it a flip-to-mute microphone, so no more fiddling within-line controls.
With regards to audio, the Cloud Stinger’s got a solid mid-range with minimal to no distortion even at high volumes. The treble is a bit underpowered and also the bass range is almost nonexistent, but 80 percent of the given game, film, or song should come through clear and clean.
If you already possess a reliable headset, particularly the original Cloud, I wouldn’t say the Stinger is important-own. But when you’re looking for the best excellent value on entry-level hardware, this can be it. It’s an insane bargain when comparing it for some other headsets in the same price tier.
At just under $100, Corsair’s Void Wireless is mainly a great wireless headset, but you will come across some compromises.
Frankly speaking, Corsair doesn’t actually have any competition within this category. Most decent wireless gaming headsets will run you $150 or higher. Corsair’s Void Wireless is priced with a mere $100, which leaves it on its lonesome.
But even accounting for that vacuum, it’s pretty good. Not phenomenal, mind you, but at this particular price you’re receiving a bargain.
I wasn’t really sure what to make from the Void’s weird, diamond-shaped ear cups but after some use I’m actually pretty pleased. The Void Wireless sits a lttle bit forward around the head, using the band resting just above your forehead. It requires some becoming accustomed to, but the outcome is less tension on the jaw and more on the rear of the pinnacle where it’s less noticeable. I wouldn’t say it’s as comfortable as being the more traditional HyperX Cloud, but certainly I love it more than its predecessor, the H2100.
The on-headset controls are fairly intuitive, having a volume rocker at the base from the left ear, plus oversized buttons for power and mute about the side. And it’s got 16.8 million color RGB lighting, if that’s your bag.
The most significant design issue is that the Void Wireless is heavy. It’s not a problem when sitting up, but when you peer down or check out the headset has a propensity to slide around. I don’t know whether it’s due to the battery or perhaps the metal-augmented construction, but your neck turns into a workout with this particular headset.
Sound-wise, the Void Wireless still needs some work. It appears passable, especially while gaming, but throwing on some music sets the Void Wireless’s limitations into stark relief. The low-end is muddy and distorted, along with the whole selection of mid-to-high-end frequencies sounds slick, like you’ve applied an excessive amount of compression.
You are able to adjust the headset’s sound in Corsair’s software, but Corsair’s software program is still a bit unwieldy. Superior to last year, I think, but nonetheless not on par with Razer, SteelSeries, or Logitech. Also, many folks have reported issues with firmware updates-not much of a great sign.
“This doesn’t appear to be a tremendously positive review,” you could say. And you’re right, it’s not. The Void Wireless will not be a terrific headset, as mentioned up top. But it is the ideal wireless gaming headset under $150, and given the amount of wires are connected to my PC at any given moment, the convenience of cheap wireless could possibly be worth sacrificing a certain amount of audio quality.
Logitech’s G533 doesn’t have quite a similar breadth of options as being the G933, but a much more restrained design and a bargain price turn this into a robust contender for the best wireless headset.
It’s a tough call replacing our former mid-tier wireless pick, the Logitech G933, having its sibling-successor the Logitech G533. Like, really tough. The G933 is a superb headset, with crisp and well-balanced audio and a few nifty design features (like being able to store the USB dongle inside an earcup).
But I’m still replacing it. Why? Well, aesthetics can be a huge reason. If you wish a sign how Logitech’s design language has shifted previously year approximately, your search is over gam1ngheadset the G933 and G533. The G933 was all sharp angles and sci-fi. The G533 on the other hand is sleek, professional, restrained. Using a piano-black finish and soft curves, it seems similar to a headset made by Audio-Technica or Sennheiser or even a more mainstream audio company-not necessarily a “gaming” headset. I like it.
The G533’s design can also be functional. The microphone isn’t as hidden as I’d like, but that’s the only flaw. The headset is lightweight, durable, and fewer vise-grip tight than its predecessor.
As for audio fidelity? It’s not quite equivalent to the G933, however the differences are minimal. The G533 lacks a little bit of oomph, especially at lower volumes, and its particular 7.1 support is subpar. Those are hardly reasons to stay away, though-the majority of people will run the headset loud enough to counteract the headset’s deficiency of presence, and virtual 7.1 is (in my opinion) virtually always bad. The G533 is worse than the average, but the average remains to be something I choose in order to avoid everyday.
Whatever the case, the G933 remains to be for sale and is a perfectly good option for some, especially if you want console support. The G533 is PC-only, even though the G933 may be attached by 3.5mm cable to other devices. And if you value comfort over audio fidelity, take a look at the SteelSeries Arctis 7 too-another great choice.
Astro’s new A50 touts a whole new charging station and better controls, but nevertheless doesn’t put out the audio you could expect coming from a $300 pair of headphones.
SteelSeries Siberia 800 Wireless Dolby 7.1 Gaming Headset
Following a new generation in the game earphone and Siberia 800 released in 2016, I was thinking we might finally break the tie that’s dominated our splurge headset pick within the last couple of years.
But when again, there’s no clear winner in that $300 price-though Astro certainly made some strides toward edging out SteelSeries.
The new A50’s biggest improvement will be the battery. The new model overcomes a long-running weak spot and packs in 12 to 15 hours of life-enough to help you through a long day of gaming. Even better, it features gyroscopes from the ears that allow it to detect whether you’ve set it up down. It automatically shuts off ten seconds later if you have, after which turns back and connects to the PC on after you pick it back up. Its base station also functions as a charger, a good mix of function and sweetness.